|
|
December 20th, 2011 “As per the terms of the consent order dated 14 December 2011, I write to withdraw the objections made to the application (No. 86368/11) for the grant of permission in relation to Montcliffe Quarry, on my behalf and on behalf of BHEAG and RAGE (incorporating Arcon Village Residents’ Group, Montcliffe Residents’ Association and Horwich Moor Residents’ Association).”
Letter x
December 14th, 2011 Marcus Simmons , spokesman for RAGE, and Martin Millmore of The Mineral Planning Group on behalf of Armstrongs Aggregates Limited have jointly issued the following statement.
We are pleased to report that the Judicial Review has been resolved via a legally binding agreement. The agreement will reduce the proposed HGV numbers for Montcliffe and Pilkington Quarries by 25% and there is a commitment on behalf of Armstrongs Aggregates to route HGVs away from the centre of Horwich during school drop off and pick up times. Armstrongs Aggregates have also agreed to provide to Bolton Council monitoring data regarding noise, dust and traffic levels, which Bolton will publish.
Armstrongs Aggregates and Bolton Council have also agreed to form an ongoing liaison group with residents, to enable residents to voice their concerns with the aim of ensuring that potential future disputes can be avoided. We see the agreement today as a positive step towards a new relationship between residents, the Council and Armstrongs Aggregates.
A Council spokesman added: “We are pleased that an agreement has been reached and the Council’s Planning Committee will be considering the Montcliffe planning application in due course.
December 9th, 2011 An update will be available shortly.
November 24th, 2011 Following the issue of the officer’s report, and the action groups’ subsequent letter (see below) Two consultee responses have appeared on the Bolton Planning website – which would appear to support some of the concerns raised in our letter.
It is unclear, how, in posession of these documents (one dated October) the officer is able to conclude that there is an adequate EIA and recommend approval with the condition proposed.
The documents can be found here.
http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/105130_12.pdf
http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/116719_29.pdf
Here is our interpretation the the transports satement - with photographs .
http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/105130_14.pdf
November 23rd, 2011 The following letter has been sent to the planning officer , concerning his report, published in the last few days.
86368-11OR x
November 23rd, 2011 Vernon Kay is encouraging people, via Twitter, to join the RAGE protest outside Montcliffe Quarry, on Thursday 24 November 2011.
One of the main concerns of the objectors will be the record number of HGVs which will be put on the roads around Horwich – with nothing stopping every single one going through the town centre of Horwich.
Other concerns include the fact that plans exist to turn the quarry into a one million tonne per year recycling centre.
The application is part of a large number of applications, at three contiguous sites, in rapid succession. So far four applications for the quarries have been considered -
- One went to appeal – but was withdrawn by Armstrongs after the planning inspector asked for additional information.
- Two have been approved, but subsequently quashed in the Judicial Review Process
- One is currently in the Judicial Review Process and will be considered 14, and 15 December 2011.
The extension for Montcliffe will be considered Thursday 24 November, at 1pm, atBolton Town Hall
Thanks Vernon
http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/9382319.Vernon_spreads_word_on_protest_over_quarry/
Donations are still urgently required to fund the current Judicial Review. Please donate here 
November 16th, 2011 Well what did you expect ?
This is Bolton – promises are meant to be broken !
Lets just hope elected members have a different view.
360 HGV trips per day 440 HGV trips per day about to hit Horwich – can it cope – who knows ?
http://www.democracy.bolton.gov.uk/CMISWebPublic/Binary.ashx?Document=15729
http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/126501_1.pdf
A special planning meeting has been scheduled on Thursday, 24th November, 2011 at 1.00pm in Committee Room A, First Floor, Bolton Town Hall. This meeting will review the Montcliffe extension planning application only.
Earlier the same day there is a visit to the Montcliffe Quarry site by the planning committee scheduled for 10.15am.
Please donate towards the current Judicial Review

November 4th, 2011  
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Judicial Review date has now been set for 14-16 December in Manchester Courts – more details will be available closer to the time. Statements need to be submitted by 14 November 2011. Public support would be greatly appreciated.
We understand the current planning application for Montcliffe will be considered on Thursday 24th November , at Bolton Town Hall. This will be a site visit scheduled for 10.15 am the same day.
These dates have now become some of the most important in the Horwich calendar – if you are able to attend – it would be very much appreciated. If you are unable to attend perhaps consider a £5 fine by pressing the donate button below

October 26th, 2011 RAGE and the four local actions groups, inluding BHEAG have submitted a massive objection to the latest Montcliffe application – the objection can be found Objection to Montcliffe Extension xx
The second judicial review is scheduled for December. Donations are still welcomed (and needed)
September 24th, 2011 A busy week, as the new application to extend the life of Montcliffe Quarry was considered by Horwich Town Council, who voted to recommend refusal of the application – which is currently operating without active planning permission.
The document from the GMGU regarding the applicatioon’s was reportedly only posted on Bolton’s website on Wednesday and has been subsequently unavailable for viewing due to an error in the council website.
We have been informed thatt the updates on the RAGE website have been simultaneously hampered by a massive cyber attack, originating from ten servers in Germany, and resulting in 45,000 hits in a relatively short space of time. Investigations are ongoing.
Last week also saw the courts consider the protective costs order, for the current Judicial review. The protective costs order limited the amount either side could claim against the other, depending on who won the case. The terms have been changed to be fairer and allow the case to continue. The date of the judicial review has also been delayed until 14-16 December 2011
RAGE are embarking on a massive fund raising campaign .
You can contribute via Paypal at: 
Why all the fuss – there have been quarries in Horwich for over a century.
Here something to consider. When permission was granted in 1950 for extraction in 18 acres of Pilkington Quarry – it was estimated that it would take three hundred years to quarry.
Advances in technology means that most of this stone, was in fact extracted in a matter of a few years, in recent history. There is now an application to extend the life of Montcliffe and a recent permission for a third quarry. These are going to be extracted at a faster rate than previously. The number of HGV is likely to be considerably more than has previously affected the area – and nobody has considered what the affects will be – or how the affects can be mitigated.
Added to that a long term plan to remove further footpaths and introduce a million tonne a year recycling centre, the concern is more than a quarry – it is the cumulative impact of three quaries
September 19th, 2011 Local residents groups often get excited with one quarry. In Horwich we now have three -although most people may not realise until they are all operating – or the 1,000,000 tonne per year recycling centre becomes a reality.
Only few months after permission was granted for a third quarry (Pilkington 2) (on the basis that Montcliffe was closing), an application to extend extraction at Montcliffe is being considered by Horwich Town Council. THURSDAY 22nd September, 7.15pm at St John’s Methodist Church on Victoria Road, Horwich.
On the same day , the Protective costs order (PCO) hearing at Manchester Civil Justice Court (time tbc) . The aim is to improve the terms of the PCO that was awarded, when the second Judicial review was approved to continue, by a judge.
At the present time the judicial review is scheduled to proceed at Manchester Civil Justice Courts, October the 3rd & 4th, although legal representatives will be seeking to delay this, during PCO hearing above.
RAGE have identified an urgent call for additional funds, to ensure that the current legal fight comes to a fair conclusion. We may not be able to stop the developments in entirety but at least RAGE are committed to ensuring that residents of Horwich. Heaton and Lostock are protected by their legal rights.
You can contribute via Paypal at: 
July 9th, 2011 “It’s a bit like MPs’ expenses. The people in power knew things weren’t right. But they didn’t do enough quickly enough.” David Cameron 08/07/11
Democracy in action ?
June 30th, 2011 Approaching 150 people turned up last night for the latest RAGE meeting – approximately 1/3 of these were attending a meeting regarding the quarries for the first time.
The audience were taken through several key aspects of the latest Montcliffe application -
The arguments were much the same as for Pilkington Quarry and some of the supporting evidence originated from the appeal, for which BHEAG had Rule 6 status :-
eg1 Rather than being a shortage of crushed rick, there is approximately 33 years supply in the North West landbank.
eg2 Rather than a c 10% increase on HGV traffic vs the 2010 Chorley Old Road survey, we calculate the uplift of c 70% when Montcliffe is operational (c 300% when Pilkingon 2 is included)
Will Georges Lane and the Junction with Chorley Road be able to withstand this volume of HGVs ?
A full copy of the presentation is available Here .
The full traffic survey can be found Here
The meeting was also told of the latest position regarding the Judicial Review on Pilkington 2- Judge Justice Charles ruled that there were arguable grounds for a Judicial Review, taking the litigation to the next stage.
A copy of the court order can be found Here
June 16th, 2011 Armstrong’s have submitted a new planning application, 86368/11 , effectively to extend the extraction at Montcliffe Quarry until 2020, with a further two years for restoration.
The officers report for the previous application, in 2005, makes interesting reading : OFFICERS REPORT (2006) It was passed by committee, the officer commenting ,
” The Applicant has given assurances that the Council will not be approached with further delays and it is recommended that the proposed extension of time be approved on this basis.”
“The Applicant has stated that there is currently 950,000 tonnes of un-worked minerals in the quarry.
A concern expressed by Horwich Town Council and local residents is that a further extension of time may be required by the Applicant in 2011 and this would result in continued delay to the restoration of the quarry. The Applicant has responded to confirm that the reserve left in the quarry has been analysed relative to the anticipated level of sales from the site and is confident that the additional time period requested will be satisfactory.”
Some five years of extraction later, and now there is approximately 1.4 million tonnes !!
Traffic remains a major concern, the quarries have been largely dormant the last few years. 240 movements a day were permitted by the Pilkington Quarry extension – currently in the Judicial Review process, which was approved on the basis that Montcliffe Quarry was ceasing extraction. (It is understood the previous operators considered extraction was no longer commercially viable.) This application requests a further 80 movements a day. That is more than one HGV every two minutes at the junction of Georges Lane and Chorley Road. On a Saturday it is an HGV every minute due to reduced times and there is nothing to stop every single HGV passing through Horwich Town Centre.
Just over 100 HGVs a day currently use Chorley road, so the number of HGVs will effectively increase c 400% (Even if only Montcliffe is considered the increase is above the 30% threshold required to trigger a full transport impact assesment).
Montcliffe Quarry is currently on a long term lease before the freehold is returned to Bolton Council, towards the end of this century. Bolton Council (and therefore the community) benefit from a proportion of income from all minerals extracted from Montcliffe Quarry.
|
|