Uncategorized

You are currently browsing the archive for the Uncategorized category.

We have obtained a copy of the file for planning permission 61530/02. Bolton Council has lost their copy and appear to have been unable to obtain a copy. We have therefore decided to make the documents publically available.

Links to the documents will be posted on this site. Links to several initial key documents are given below.

 We mainain that 61530/02  is not a ROMP permission, and therefore the Earthline case is not relevant. The end date is a valid condition.

 In any event extraction in the quarry is complete and no evidence has been provided otherwise to support extending the ROMP permission end date.

61530/02 Documents

Applicants supporting statement
 
http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/61530-02-supporting-statement.pdf
 
Officers report (decision deferred)
 
http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/61530-02-officers-report1.pdf
 
Officers report (final)
 
http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/61530-02-officers-report2.pdf

RAGE

A new group has been formed in Bolton, RAGE, Rise Against Greenbelt Exploitation.

In the Greenbelt there is a presumption against development. Whilst the initial focus of the group is the development of a new house, in the West Pennine Moors Greenbelt, the omission of the West Pennine Moors in the proposed Bolton Core Strategy has not gone unnoticed. In particular the proposal to remove Rivington and Winter Hill as a key place for toursim and turn the location into probably the largest waste processing and land fill site in Greater Manchester.

Blackrod and Horwich Environmental Action Group have been asking Bolton Council seven very simple questions for nearly six months. Depite being escalated to Sean Harriss the Chief Executive since the beginning of the year, Bolton Council have refused to answer these questions.

One such question was that in October 2009, Bolton Council stated that there was an agreed restoration plan for Pilkington Quarry. The Environment Agency stated they were not aware of this plan ( despite the fact they should have been consulted). The council have now ammended their position stating “I am sure there is one” but have so far failed to provide any evidence.

In fact the only document we can find, would allow the importation of approximately six million tonnes of Greater Manchester Waste to be imported in to Horwich Moor. The document says it is approved and yet the Environment Agency objected to it in the strongest manner. We have asked for this “error” to be corrected but as yet the council have failed to do so.

During the 2008/9 Pilkington Quarry planning application it was necessary for the group to send a legal letter to the Council, to ensure they upheld their legal obligations. A significant amount of new evidence has been identified since this letter was written. Once again the council are showing total disregard for their own rule book and democracy, by refusing to answer our questions. The motif is unclear.

Rise Against Greenbelt Exploitation

Stage two of the Greater Manchester Waste Disposal consultation has clearly identified two sites at Rivington as a potential location for Greater Manchester’s waste.(In a previous document one of these sites was identified as particularly important to the strategy)

The two sites are Montcliffe Quarry and Pilkington Quarry. Both have agreed restoration plans – Montcliffe to become a place for leisure by 2012.    Pilkington quarry should  have been restored by 2008, in accordance with the 1950 and 1968,1997 and 2002 planning permissions, as stone extraction was completed several years ago.

You would think that Rivington was safe ?

Pilkington Quarry has been subject to spotlight over the last twelve months. As green waste has been allowed to be imported into the quarry (even though the planning permission allows only inert waste). This has been allowed to happen even though planning permission has expired. In 2009 this waste was found to have contaminated the surface water. There is additional contaminated land within the quarry. A new planning permission is currently seeking to extend the life of the quarry until 2042 (see 83299/09)

Montcliffe quarry is also subject to discussions by Bolton Council for use in waste disposal.

Both sites are in the Green Belt. Both sites have agreed restoration timescales. Bolton’s current UDP currently identifies the West Pennine Moors (including Rivington) as particularly important to tourism. This is about to change.

Bolton’s new Core Strategy, currently in the consultation phase until 06 March 2010, specifically excludes the West Pennine Moors as being important to tourism, removing some of the safeguard against inappropriate development in one of the most beautiful areas in our locality.

Please make your thoughts known to your local ward councillors, Bolton Council and the press.

Please make sure that anyone who loves this area, vists or lives in this area because of the landscape and the greenbelt knows about the situation.

Please see these links :-

 GMGU joint waste development plan document main page
 

http://www.gmwastedpd.co.uk/ 

 The GMGU Outcomes Report 
see sections 6.34 to 6.36
 .

 2010 is the International Year of Biodiversity

The order to change schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, will be made early in 2010 and will come into force on 06 April 2010.

Wildlife Minister Huw Irranca-Davies said:

“It is essential that our native species are given the protection they need to flourish.  2010 is the International Year of Biodiversity and it’s more important than ever to do all that we can to halt the loss of biodiversity.  Stopping the spread of invasive non-native species makes a real difference to the survival of our own native plants, birds and animals.”

Himalayan Balsam has been added to the schedule 9

Section 14  prohibits planting in the wild of plants listed in Part II of schedule 9, or otherwise causing to them grow there. These provisions are necessary to prevent the establishment of non-native species which may be detrimental to our native wildlife.

Link to the full story and further background. http://www.webnewswire.com/node/492309

Further information on control can be found using the links at the right hand side of this page

Friends Of Lever Park

We would like to congratulate Friends of Lever Park, on the findings by the Local Government Ombudsman against Chorley Borough Council

6 counts of maladministration

2 counts of injustice

This unfortunately does not reverse the planning decision and the injustice that this causes, including effectively closing the bridleway on Sundays.

A new application regarding the Lever Park site is expected shortly, so please watch out on the approach to Christmas and make your opinion count.

Montcliffe Quarry

The Director of Corporate Resources (Bolton Council) submitted a report which advised the Executive member of the current situation with regard to Montcliffe Quarry.

The report advised that the current lessee had served notice of their intention to cease extraction from the quarry and, as a result, the Council had been approached by Armstrongs Environmental Services Limited for the lease to be issued to them.

The report outlined a number of options available to the Council and a view was sought on the desired way to proceed -
Instruction received to discuss with Armstrong’s a strategic relocation of recycling operations from Horwich Loco to Montcliffe Quarry.

A letter has been sent to the Executive committe of Bolton Council, expressing our concerns

Pilkington Quarry

A new planning application has been made to extend the current operation until 2042

Please see the new application  update, 83299/09  (click “home”)

 

http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/DCOnlineV2/AcolNetCGI.dcgov?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=76767

We are currently considering our position

Over the last few months, various planning applications have resulted in  residents coming together and fighting for the community. Many have formed  residents groups – something that we would encourage.

We welcome the formation of 

                          The Friends of Lever Park,

                          The  Arcon Village Residents Association,

                          The  Horwich Moor Residents Association,

                          The Montcliffe Residents Association.

     Together we can make a positive difference

 

 

I am reminded of a poem attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)

“First they came for the communists,

          and I did not speak out

         —because I was not a communist;

Then they came for the trade unionists,

          and I did not speak out

         —because I was not a trade unionist;

Then they came for the Jews,

          and I did not speak out

          —because I was not a Jew;

Then they came for me

      —and there was no one left to speak out for me

 

If you need support to speak out, contact us with total confidentiality at BHEAG@Hotmail.co.uk

 

Friends of Lever Park

There will be a meeting for “friends of Lever Park” and their supporters on Thursday the 10th December 2009, it will be held at HORWICH CONSERVATIVE CLUB, Church Street Horwich, with an 8-00pm start.

Agenda: (i) Report on the Ombudsman’s final decision.

(ii) Report on complaint made to the Information Commissioners Office.

(iii) Outlining our intentions following the final decision by the LGO

(iv) A-O-B

The officers report is now on-line, with a recommendation to approve the application.

We would encourage anyone reading this article to read the reponses from the consultees (not all are available on-line !) and try to reconcile this with the report and the attached conditions.

(The planning application link on the right hand side will take you to the relevant council site)

We would also draw your attention to decision notices 50252/97 (limiting quarry operation until 2007) and 61530/02 (also limiting quarry operation until 2007 and also limiting transport), not 2042 as indicated in the application and officers report.

The application form advises 1.2 Million cubic metres for filling, subsequent correspondence from MPG would indicate this volume has now increased to 2.05 million tonnes.

We have identified a significant number of other discrepencies / issues.

An excellent quote from the Greater Manchester Geology Unit (GMGU) states :-

“An environmental statement should be comprehensive and include all relevant environmental information to inform the decision maker, consultees and the public and thereby enable scrutiny, comment and informed decision making”

The Planning meeting will consider this application at 14:00 on 29 October 2009.
The public are invited to attend

Please see the new application 83299/09  (click “home”)

« Older entries