<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blackrod and Horwich Environmental Action Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk</link>
	<description>Two communities - one cause</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:33:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Turbine Update</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/turbine-update/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/turbine-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wind turbines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The decision was deferred by planning committee due to the late information.</p> <p>The late report will be linked here as soon as it is available.</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The decision was deferred by planning committee due to the late information.</p>
<p>The late report will be linked here as soon as it is available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/turbine-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Douglas Valley Turbines &#8211; now only one turbine !   UPDATED</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/douglas-valley-turbines-now-only-one-turbine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/douglas-valley-turbines-now-only-one-turbine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[greenbelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that the application has now been ammended to only one turbine &#8211; due to the presence of a gas line.</p> <p>It is our understanding that the only turbine now being applied for is turbine 1, closest to the golf house. This turbine also appears to have moved again &#8211; although this is <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/douglas-valley-turbines-now-only-one-turbine/">Douglas Valley Turbines &#8211; now only one turbine !   UPDATED</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would appear that the application has now been ammended to only one turbine &#8211; due to the presence of a gas line.</p>
<p>It is our understanding that the only turbine now being applied for is turbine 1, closest to the golf house. This turbine also appears to have moved again &#8211; although this is not clear. UPDATE :  <em>turbine 1 has not moved.</em><br />
There are currently several objections  or requests for deferment :</p>
<p>NERL &#8211; air traffic control<br />
MOD  &#8211;<br />
Joint Radio Company</p>
<p>Ofcom also needs to be consulted</p>
<p>The site also requires a bat survey to be completed prior to any permission being granted.</p>
<p>Residents have asked for a deferral to ensure an appropriate noise assesment can be completed</p>
<p>It is further a matter of law and good practice that the base line should include any developments for which permission has already been granted &#8211; ie the biomass plant. It would therefore be incorrect to assume that the turbine will offset carbon usage on the site. </p>
<p><em>Whilst it seems likely the application will be deferred it is still for the planning committee to decide</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/02/douglas-valley-turbines-now-only-one-turbine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blind as a Bat &#8211; Daft as a Brush</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/blind-as-a-bat-daft-as-a-brush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/blind-as-a-bat-daft-as-a-brush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenbelt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ask most people what they think of renewable energy and generally they will respond positively. Most people however also confuse the terminology with environmentally friendly or sustainable energy which can be something quite different. The looming shortage of electricty generation, together with a UK commitment to produce 25% of energy from renenewable energy sources by <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/blind-as-a-bat-daft-as-a-brush/">Blind as a Bat &#8211; Daft as a Brush</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask most people what they think of renewable energy and generally they will respond positively.<br />
Most people however also confuse the terminology with environmentally friendly or sustainable energy which can be  something quite different.<br />
The looming shortage of electricty generation, together with a UK commitment to produce 25% of energy from renenewable energy sources by 2025 has helped drive up domestic energy prices as the government subsidises and incentivises private renewable energy production.</p>
<p>What most people want is sensitive exploitation of renewable energy sources which are sustainable. </p>
<p>The use of biofuels causes problems in many areas of the world. Land clearance has caused many issues in the developing world. One clearance fire resulted in more CO2 emissions than the UK would produce in a single year. People lose their homes, their land their lives.<br />
Food crops are replaced with energy crops and prices anre driven higher, leaving people to starve. Its a global economy, driven by supply and demand &#8211; where the rich win and the poor die.<br />
Swaithes of rainforests are being deforested to grow palm oil &#8211; for burning. Increasing global CO2 production.<br />
Are biofiels and renewable energy  a good thing ? ht<a href="http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/" title="BIOFUELWATCH" target="_blank">tp://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk</a>/</p>
<p>Hydro electric power accounts for nearly 20% of China&#8217;s power production.  Recently Chinese officials staged a sudden about-face, acknowledging for the first time that the massive Three Georges hydroelectric dam, the world&#8217;s largest, sandwiched between breathtaking cliffs on the Yangtze River in central China, may be triggering landslides, altering entire ecosystems and causing other serious environmental problems—and, by extension, endangering the millions who live in its shadow. <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=chinas-three-gorges-dam-disaster" title="Three Georges Dam" target="_blank">Three Georges Dam</a> Is hydro electric a good thing ?</p>
<p>Last year, the world&#8217;s largest wood fueled biomass plant was approved &#8211; in the UK. If built it will use an estimated 60 million tonnes of wood a year &#8211; six times the UKs average wood production. The sad thing is that the wood that will be burned does not have to be replaced with new trees.  Guess we will be importing even more wood and adding more to world CO2 levels. !The biggest threat to the Mountain Gorillas in the Congo &#8211; is the clearance of forest for charcoal production &#8211; a renewable energy source. Is renewable energy a good thing ?<br />
  <a href="http://globalforestcoalition.org/?p=1486" title="Tilbury" target="_blank">Tilbury</a></p>
<p>Not all renewable  energy projects are bad &#8211; to the  contrary, but nor are they all good.  The plan to use solar power, harnessed in the dessert, to supply 15% of Europes power by 2050 . That seems a much better idea than covering arable farmland with solar panels in the UK <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-15984493" title="Desert Power" target="_blank">Desert power</a>.<br />
 Admirably the UK leads the way with off shore wind farms and behind the curve small scale domestic renewable energy projects &#8211; although these  are now starting to have a benefit in the UK.</p>
<p>The UK government is encouraging small scale energy production, solar PV, wind power etc. Bolton&#8217;s core startegy encourages the use of CHP (Combined heat and Power) which can be over 90%efficient.<br />
The largest biomass CHP for district heating plant is in Japan &#8211; 2MWe.<br />
In Blackrod a plant twice this size has been approved at the Douglas Valley Golf Course, for district heating. The plant will burn approximately 5% of the total wooded are inthe North West of England each year &#8211; and produce enough electric for 11,000 houses and enough heat energy to heat the whole of Blackrod. Unfortunately the plant will only actually heat six houses, and the rest of the thermal energy will be wasted &#8211; making it one of the least efficient CHP plants in the world &#8211; estimated at below 20% &#8211; wasting valuable energy resources-  <strong>an environmental crime</strong>.</p>
<p>The same site has also applied for two industrial wind turbines &#8211; despite guidance to the contrary unfortunately the proposed turbine tips will be within 50m of hedgerows and linear field structures. (In fact they are within a few meters). Why is this important ?<br />
Some of Europe&#8217;s most endangered species &#8211; bats &#8211; use these linear structures as highways &#8211; they will virtually never fly accross an open field. Turbine blades have been responsible for many bat kills -it is unlawful to deliberately kill a bat &#8211; and contributory negligence by ignoring the guidlines is unlikely to provide a defence &#8211; <strong>an environmental crime</strong>.</p>
<p>It is likely that there will be multiple legally enforceable objections to the turbines, due to the deficient impact assesment, and potentially serious safety concerns, once the statutory consultees (who were omitted from the consultation by the applicant and Bolton Council) have responded, and proposed unlawful conditions removed.</p>
<p>For those who would wish renewable energy at any cost &#8211; be careful what you wish for &#8211; dont be daft &#8211; think &#8211; sensitive exploitation of renewable energy sources which are sustainable.</p>
<p>Blind as Bat &#8211; Daft as a Brush</p>
<p>Energy efficiency is probably the best way we, as individuals can reduce the demand for energy and help achieve the 25% target. Many domestic energy suppliers now provide free roof insulation and free cavity wall insulation. If you havent yet gone down this route &#8211; or at least had a free consultation you to may be commiting an environmental crime. Please help <strong>Save the Planet &#8211; without costing the Earth</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/blind-as-a-bat-daft-as-a-brush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Douglas Valley Turbine Update</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/a-camera-never-lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/a-camera-never-lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[greenbelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The photographs below show the first photographic submission by the applicant, the latest submission by the applcant (both using a wide angle lens) and our interpretation &#8211; the latter using a 50mm lens and more correctly exposed, which is good practice when depicting visual impact. All are taken from approximately the same location. An actual <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/a-camera-never-lies/">Douglas Valley Turbine Update</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The photographs below show the first photographic submission by the applicant, the latest submission by the applcant (both using a wide angle lens) and our interpretation &#8211; the latter using a 50mm lens and more correctly exposed, which is good practice when depicting visual impact. All are taken from approximately the same location. An actual WES turbine, in actual colours is shown in our interpretation)  (It should be noted that we believe our interpretation still underestimates the impact, as the baloon, used to centre the turbine was not flying at a vertical height of 30m) <em>Click on the images to see a larger view</em><br />
<a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Untitled-1.jpg"><img src="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Untitled-1-300x158.jpg" alt="" title="Turbine1a" width="300" height="158" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1913" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/t1.jpg"><img src="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/t1-300x175.jpg" alt="" title="t1" width="300" height="175" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2256" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/t2.jpg"><img src="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/t2-300x200.jpg" alt="" title="t2" width="300" height="200" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2257" /></a></p>
<p>At the same time the turbines have been getting quieter with the latest noise assement appears to claim  that at 200m a turbine will be 37 dB, rather than the 45dB claimed on the manufacturers website.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, the site is approved for a biomass plant.Having stated &#8220;we have had no other option but to shelve this project for the time being&#8221;, around the 17 October 2011, within a month work had commenced on the plant.</p>
<p>It is good that people from outside the area are in favour of wind turbines, as are we. It is unlikely that they are aware of the impact of these specific turbines as it has been almost impossible to understand from the data which has been submitted.</p>
<p> Wind turbines  are an excellent form of renewable energy. Some people do not like them spoiling the views in the countryside when out for a walk. This is considerably different from having one invading the privacy of your own home, either visually or with noise &#8211;  particularly relevant to the proposed turbines at Douglas Valley given the topography of the land and the number of people directly affected.</p>
<p> There will be many more applications for turbines in the local area &#8211; it is only to be hoped that these will provide accurate and detailed informtion from the outset and that they will not effect so many residents on a personal basis &#8211; so that the whole community can embrace this technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/a-camera-never-lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fields to be lost in houses plan</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/fields-to-be-lost-in-houses-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/fields-to-be-lost-in-houses-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenbelt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Residents of Blackrod and Horwich need only look to Adlington to see what may happen soon. The green fields adjacent to Blackrod have been allocated 179 houses in Chorley&#8217;s draft allocation plan. A developer is likely to put in an application for 300 houses on the site within the next two weeks. Planning approval has <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/fields-to-be-lost-in-houses-plans/">Fields to be lost in houses plan</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Residents of Blackrod and Horwich need only look to Adlington to see what may happen soon.<br />
The green fields adjacent to Blackrod have been allocated 179 houses in  Chorley&#8217;s draft allocation plan. A developer is likely to put in an application for 300 houses on the site within the next two weeks.<br />
Planning approval has already been given for c 70 houses at the foot of the site, alongside the railway.<br />
ie 370 houses &#8211; more than twice what was expected and even before the allocation plan is approved.</p>
<p>In Blackrod, it has been noted that the boundary of the Blackrod Industrial Estate, for infilling, also contains a number of greenbelt fields. </p>
<p>Please make your views known </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/fields-to-be-lost-in-houses-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>39 Houses to Replace Blackrod Community Centre ?</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/consulation-finishes-by-27-january-2012-houses-to-replace-community-centre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/consulation-finishes-by-27-january-2012-houses-to-replace-community-centre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The consultation, on the draft allocation plan is ending in the next few weeks. Among the allocated proposals are to replace Blackrod Community Centre with 39 houses. This has already passed the preliminary stages &#8211; hence the allocation. Other sites which have allocations against them include the green spaces on Shawbury Close and Manchester Road. <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/consulation-finishes-by-27-january-2012-houses-to-replace-community-centre/">39 Houses to Replace Blackrod Community Centre ?</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The consultation, on the draft allocation plan is ending in the next few weeks.<br />
Among the allocated proposals are to replace <strong>Blackrod Community Centre</strong> with 39 houses. This has already passed the preliminary stages &#8211; hence the allocation.<br />
Other sites which have allocations against them include the green spaces on <strong>Shawbury Close</strong> and <strong>Manchester Road</strong>.<br />
There are also a number of unallocated proposals which include changing Scott Lane Industrial Estate, into a housing development.It has been noted that the boundary of the Blackrod Industrial Estate, for infilling, also contains a number of greenbelt fields.</p>
<p>The  documents can be found <a href="http://www.bolton.gov.uk/sites/documentcentre/Documents/Draft%20Allocations%20Plan_Sustainability%20Appraisal_Appendix%209%20Horwich%20and%20Blackrod.pdf" title="Here" target="_blank">Here </a> and  <a href='http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/draft-allocatiom.pdf'>draft allocation</a></p>
<p>Please notes comments must be submitted to bolton Council by 27 January 2012, the following link to Bolton Councl web pages , allows you to make comments on-line or print off forms for postal submission.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bolton.gov.uk/website/pages/LDFAllocationsPlan.aspx?bid=4356" title="Bolton Council LDF Consultation" target="_blank">Bolton Council LDF Consultation</a></p>
<p>Alternatively the link below enables you to zoom in on a particular feature and add comments more easily <em><br />
</em><a href="http://maps.bolton.gov.uk/residents/allocations-dpd-solomap.html" title="Map and Comments" target="_blank">Map and Comments</a></p>
<p>Comments can also be emailed to <strong><a href="mailto:LDFconsultation@bolton.gov.uk">LDFconsultation@bolton.gov.uk</a></strong> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2012/01/consulation-finishes-by-27-january-2012-houses-to-replace-community-centre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Turbines Move &#8211; and so do the Planning Pages</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/turbines-move-and-so-do-the-planning-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/turbines-move-and-so-do-the-planning-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenbelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The latest information on the Douglas Valley Golf Course Turbines, can be found</p> <p>HERE</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest information on the Douglas Valley Golf Course Turbines, can be found</p>
<p><a href="http://www.planningpa.bolton.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&#038;keyVal=DCAPR_80301" title="HERE" target="_blank">HERE</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/turbines-move-and-so-do-the-planning-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>300 Home Estate Planned in Adlington, on the Blackrod Border</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/blackrod-attacked-from-adlington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/blackrod-attacked-from-adlington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Plans for 300 homes ‘would completely destroy the area’ Fox Strategic Land &#038; Property are proposing the development of upto 300 homes on land off Bolton Road, Adlington, Chorley.</p> <p>Chorley Guardian</p> <p>Protest website</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plans for 300 homes ‘would completely destroy the area’<br />
Fox Strategic Land &#038; Property are proposing the development of upto 300 homes on land off Bolton Road, Adlington, Chorley.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chorley-guardian.co.uk/news/local/plans_for_300_homes_would_completely_destroy_the_area_1_4056402">Chorley Guardian</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.landoffboltonroad.com/">Protest website</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/blackrod-attacked-from-adlington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/happy-christmas-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/happy-christmas-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind turbines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p> Happy Christams and Best Wishes for 2012</p> <p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><large> Happy Christams and Best Wishes for 2012</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/turbine-christmas.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2049" title="turbine christmas" src="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/turbine-christmas.jpg" </a/></a></p>
<p>&#8220;Well there was no condition specifying it could not be illumintated  !!!&#8221;</large></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/happy-christmas-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Groups Withdraw Montcliffe Objection</title>
		<link>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/groups-withdraw-montcliffe-objection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/groups-withdraw-montcliffe-objection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[greenbelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quarries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAGE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bheag.co.uk/?p=2135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As per the terms of the consent order dated 14 December 2011, I write to withdraw the objections made to the application (No. 86368/11) for the grant of permission in relation to Montcliffe Quarry, on my behalf and on behalf of BHEAG and RAGE (incorporating Arcon Village Residents&#8217; Group, Montcliffe Residents&#8217; Association and Horwich Moor <span style="color:#777"> . . . &#8594; Read More: <a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/groups-withdraw-montcliffe-objection/">Groups Withdraw Montcliffe Objection</a></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As per the terms of the consent order dated 14 December 2011, I write to withdraw the objections made to the application (No. 86368/11) for the grant of permission in relation to Montcliffe Quarry, on my behalf and on behalf of BHEAG and RAGE (incorporating Arcon Village Residents&#8217; Group, Montcliffe Residents&#8217; Association and Horwich Moor Residents&#8217; Association).&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bheag.co.uk/http://www.bheag.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Montcliffe-withdrawal-x1.doc">Letter x</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bheag.co.uk/2011/12/groups-withdraw-montcliffe-objection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

