Blackrod Rose Garden

Following the successful community support in improving the local cemetery and the “big tree” on Station Road. The Action Group has the local rose garden in their sites.

The first big tidy up will be tomorrow, hopefully followed by some winter planting in time for Remembrance Sunday.

It is hoped that the group can raise enough funds to completely renovate the rose garden , and advice on planting and varieties has already been sought from some of Great Britain’s  best and most passionate rose growers.

Important Quarry Dates

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The Judicial Review date has now been set for 14-16 December in Manchester Courts – more details will be available closer to the time. Statements need to be submitted by 14 November 2011. Public support would be greatly appreciated.

We understand the current planning application for Montcliffe will be considered on Thursday 24th November , at Bolton Town Hall. This will be a site visit scheduled for 10.15 am the same day.

These dates have now become some of the most important in the Horwich calendar – if you are able to attend – it would be very much appreciated. If you are unable to attend perhaps consider a £5 fine by pressing the donate button below

Golf balls and ice

The outer tips of the turbine blades will travel at up to  246 miles per hour

  • What happens if a golf ball from the driving range hits this moving object ?

The Highways agency consider the issue:-

 ‘Icing’   

9. A further factor that must be considered is the phenomenon of ice being thrown from the turbine blades (‘icing’). In certain meteorological conditions, significant accretionsof ice can build up on wind turbine blades. Surprisingly, moving blades are affected toa far greater extent than stationary blades.

10. Warming or fragmentation may then lead to ice being shed from the rotating blades. Large fragments may be thrown a considerable distance.

11. Again, this is a very rare event and the frequency of occurrence does decrease markedly with distance. Nevertheless, the consequences of an ice projectile hitting a moving vehicle could be severe. Not only would the occupants be at risk but a multivehicle accident could result.

12. Most modern wind turbines will have vibration and/or climate sensitive technology that will shut down the turbine if there is the potential for icing. Where this technology is present there should be no need to consider this issue further. Evidence of this technology on the proposed turbines should be provided.

Quote of the day : “ 

“The Council and its partners will: Ensure Protected Open Land around Horwich and Blackrod remains undeveloped and will Ensure that new development does not harm the landscape setting and protects views from public areas to the surrounding landscape.
I have to wonder how much power generation will have to be carried out in this area before it is considered too much.”

Location of the turbines

Our best interpretation of the location of the  turbines is given below. (Based on SD references and photograph montages) The height (including rotors ) is approximately the same as the Roscoe tower (to the left of the Millstone). The red dots have a diameter equivelant to  approximately 30-40 m. Small is definately not a word you would honestly  use to describe them. (The department for transport classes a small turbine as upto 50Kw)

This would appear to contravene guidance http://www.snh.gov.uk/docs/C245244.pdf

Objection to Montcliffe extension

RAGE and the four local actions groups, inluding BHEAG have submitted a massive objection to the latest Montcliffe application – the objection can be found  Objection to Montcliffe Extension xx

The second judicial review is scheduled for December. Donations are still welcomed (and needed)

Latest Turbine Visuals

Note: the above photo has been corrected to a normal lens, rather than wide angle

Donald Trump pledges ‘any legal means’ fight against windfarm

 ” turbines will ‘compromise’ golf” 

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/05/donald-trump-legal-fight-windfarm

see aslo http://www.golfclubmanagement.net/2011/09/wind-turbines-they-dont-have-to-be-big-but-they-are-clever/

Closer to home,

(http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/111580_6.pdf) may misrepresent the appearance of the 2 turbines. The location from where the photograph was taken is 149m ASL (above sea level) and the left turbine tip height is 157m ASL (the ground level appears to be 112m ASL). The extract below of the montage highlights Roscoe Lowe (Red box) which is 160m ASL. Therefore the top of the rotor will be in line with this feature. 

http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/111580_17.pdf

  • Meanwhile the 45m high, 700m squared sweep (x2)  of the turbine blades was represented by a yellow balloon flying on a 30m length   (in slight wind).  Unsurprisingly this cannot be seen on two of the submitted photographs (even though one is in close proximity) – how strange. http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/Documents/110598_56.pdf  

If anyone does spot the balloon perhaps they can let us know (or is that the whole purpose – the agent wants residents to believe  nobody is actually going to see the turbines   ?) How very bizarre – almost unbelievable

  • Then I suppose the high energy use of the golf course, the reason for the biomass plant and two turbines, which will produce 36 GWh of electric per year, enough electric  for almost  11,000 houses (each using 3,300Kwh) is also unbelievable

Wind Turbine Syndrome

A link to the most recent (draft) report can be found here
 
Abstract
 
  
 There is overwhelming evidence that wind turbines cause serious health problems in nearby 
residents, usually stress-disorder type diseases, at a nontrivial rate. The bulk of the evidence

takes the form of thousands of adverse event reports. There is also a small amount of

systematically-gathered data. The adverse event reports provide compelling evidence of the

seriousness of the problems and of causation in this case because of their volume, the ease of

observing exposure and outcome incidence, and case-crossover data. Proponents of turbines

have sought to deny these problems by making a collection of contradictory claims including that

the evidence does not “count”, the outcomes are not “real” diseases, the outcomes are the victims’

own fault, and that acoustical models cannot explain why there are health problems so the

problems must not exist. These claims appeared to have swayed many non-expert observers,

though they are easily debunked. Moreover, though the failure of models to explain the

observed problems does not deny the problems, it does mean that we do not know what, other

than kilometers of distance, could sufficiently mitigate the effects. There has been no policy

analysis that justifies imposing these effects on local residents. The attempts to deny the

evidence cannot be seen as honest scientific disagreement, and represent either gross

incompetence or intentional bias.

 A recent Canadian court case concluded “
   
This case has successfully shown that the debate should not be simplified to one about whether wind turbines can cause harm to humans.The evidence presented to the Tribunal demonstrates that they can, if facilities are placed too close to residents. The debate has now evolved to one of degree.”

http://www.ert.gov.on.ca/english/decisions/index.htm

 

A summary of new evidence can be found here

 

 

A Big Thank You

A big thank you from Blackrod residents to the army of helpers who delivered nearly two thousand leaflets, concerning the Douglas Valley Turbine development today – in wind and hail.

Group Objection to Wind Turbines at Douglas Valley Golf Course

Reluctantly the group has decided to object to the application for two turbines at Douglas Valley Golf Course.
The reasons can be found here Objection to Douglas Valley Turbines

WES 30 Turbine Videos

The enclosed links are the actual model of turbines which are proposed for Douglas Valley Golf Course. (Note these appear to be promotional videos so are showing the positive aspects of the turbines)

Turning into the wind (have the volume on)  Turning

On a Bury Golf Course (get an idea of size) Golf Course (size)

See how fast this rotates  speed

Size (again)

Noise (on the public footpath)

Turbines Cause Health Concern to Blackrod

Many experts believe  the turbines on Douglas Valley Golf course could present a health risk to the majority of Blackrod residents ie those who live within the 1 Km boundary.  Evidently a considerable number of people live within the 500m zone – which we believe should be reason to refuse the application Turbine –Douglas Valley Golf Course. It would appear such a development would not be allowed in many European Countries. A Link to set back distances (in 2009)  can be found here. Indeed 500m appears to be  the minimum distance in Germany, France and Sweden – all countries with considerably more renewable on-shore wind generation than England.

 The farm, which has been in the same ownership for many generations, has become almost unrecognisable in recent years, and now seems to becoming more and more industrialised. The cumulative effect of the  massively oversized biomass plant (which the applicant still intends to progress)  and wind turbines is totally unacceptable to many people.  The  interaction of the biomass plant and wind turbines does not appear to have even been considered. In Scotland the type of turbine proposed is considered more suitable to industrial sites.

The current proposals, before the House of Lords, would prevent  wind turbines upto 5om in height (including blades)   being built within 1 Km of a residential property – due to health concerns (see previous article).

Wind Turbine legislation – receives second reading

Wind Turbines – minimum distances from residential premises-bill This is the bill which has now had it’s “Second Reading” in the House of Lords and sets a minimum setback distance of 2km for a turbine of 120m. This is at a very early stage, which is reflected in the brief content of the bill itself. None-the-less, this clearly demonstrates that there is genuine and real concern about the effects of wind turbines sited too close to populated areas. The presentation of this bill forces the question:

The legislation proposes, if the height of the wind turbine generator is— (measured from the ground to the end of the blade tip at its highest point.)

(a) greater than 25m, but does not exceed 50m, the minimum distance requirement is 1000m;

(b) greater than 50m, but does not exceed 100m, the minimum distance requirement is 1500m;

(c) greater than 100m, but does not exceed 150m, the minimum distance requirement is 2000m;

A similar bill Onshore Wind Turbines (Proximity of Habitation) Bill 2010-11  is winding its way through the House of Commons, with the next reading expected JAnuary 2012

Why – simply put healths concerns and masses of law suits in various countries. It appears it is not just the audible noise and visual impacts that effects people but also infrasound (frequency less than 20 Hz).

Many countries  have already acted on concerns and introduced appropriate legislation – similar to that proposed in the rest of the UK.

In Scotland, Scottish planning guidance contains an advisory, rather than mandatory, limit of two kilometres, although the Scottish border Council has a presumption against any turbine within 2 KM of a residential property. In Wales there is a “typical seperation distance”  of 500m – although Carmarthanshire County Council will not permit wind farms within 1500m of a residential dwelling. ( The 500m separation distance is intended to assist local planning authorities refine the boundaries of the Strategic Search Areas and not as a minimum separation distance for individual wind turbines. )

Proposed Scottish legislation goes further, in suggesting that two blade turbines be limited to industrial sitings, due to the faster sweep ( a 30m turbine (45m including blades), would have an area sweep of c 700m2)

Aberdeenshire Council Local Plan Infrastructure Policy states

“In order to protect residential amenity, wind energy developments should generally be not less than 400m from dwellings. The actual desirable separation distance will be dependent on a range of factors including topography, safety issues, noise, shadow flicker, shadow throw and the size of the turbines.

A separation distance of at least 10 rotor diameters between the wind turbines and nearby dwellings is required, in accordance with good practice identified in PAN 45 to minimise shadow flicker.”

Similarly Torridge district Council, in Devon, has made an extensive study and limits developments to within 600m, The full policy (with a summary page 6/7 ) can be found CHttpHandler

It is important to look at the Bill’s effects. The figure is that if there was an exclusion around dwellings of two kilometres, 0.5 per cent of the UK landmass would be able to take wind turbines. Effectively, we would end that industry completely

The revised Draft National Policy Statement for Renewable Energy Infrastructure (EN-3), which is currently before Parliament, says,

“appropriate distances should be maintained between wind turbines and residential properties to protect residential amenity”.

In the circumstances it would seem rather prudent to introduce more “targeted” planning guidance and we will be seeking to encourage a half way house -

A Presumption against development within 1 KM of a residential house

 B minimum  distance of 500m from a residential house

A copy of the bill can be found here:  http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201011/ldbills/017/11017.1-i.html

A copy of the second reading can be found here: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2011-06-10a.488.4&s=%22global+warming+policy+foundation%22

Small and groups of small turbines http://www.snh.gov.uk/docs/A516125.pdf

http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2010-11/onshorewindturbinesproximityofhabitation.html

THE CURRENT DOUGLAS VALLEY GOLF COURSE APPLICATION, FOR TWO 45 m TURBINES, APPROXIMATELY 350m from BLACKROD VILLAGE CAN BE FOUND HERE

London, 22nd October: Protest against biofuels fuelling climate meltdown

 

 

Protest against biofuels fuelling climate meltdown

Where:  DECC – Department of Energy & Climate Change, 3 Whitehall Place, SW1A 2AW. Nearest tube stations, Embankment & Charing Cross.

When: Saturday 22nd October, 12.00 noon

Who is the protest for? – for anyone concerned about environment and social justice.

Why: The protest coincides with a DECC public consultation on Renewable Obligation Certificates – ROCs, which are subsidies for ‘renewable electricity’. Yet instead of rewarding only true renewable energy, such as sustainable wind and solar power, a large and growing share of ROCs goes to biomass (wood) and biofuel power stations. Those are paid for by all of us, through a surcharge on our fuel bills. At a time when health, education, social welfare and environmental programmes are being cut drastically, the government is planning to reward biomass and biofuel power stations with £3 billion a year!

Biomass and biofuel production causes deforestation and adversely affects the climate, food sovereignty and human rights. Nearly all of the biomass and biofuels burned in UK power stations will be imported from countries including Indonesia, Brazil, Ghana or Kenya. Burning biomass and biofuel causes air pollution causing health problems for those who live nearby. This protest will show DECC that people don’t want to subsidise bioenergy.

Corporations like Drax, one of Europe’s biggest climate change contributors, are lobbying DECC to increase their profits from burning the biosphere. If UK citizens who pay for ROCs tell DECC yes to true renewable power from wind, wave, tidal, solar & geothermal and no to bioenergy we can stop this destructive industry overnight.

Supported by

Supported by Campaign Against Climate Change 

Let’s cut-back on bioenergy instead of cutting libraries or rainforests.

Let’s have people power instead of plant power!

Bring a friend, your banners and placards to the Department of Environment & Climate Change on the 22nd.

Please click here

Wind Turbines Coming to Blackrod ?

Markland Farm / Douglas Valley Golf Course has been given permission for a 4MWe biomass plant, capable of supplying electric for c 10,000 houses, and heating the whole of Blackrod – subject to rubber stamping by the secretary of state – as it is contrary to Bolton Planning Policy. The plant will actually only heat six houses and supply a small amount of electric to the hamlet – the majority being exported to the grid – making it potentially the least efficient CHP plant in the world.

The same applicant now wnats to build two 145 feet wind turbines  (100 foot mast + blades) – also to supply electric  energy to the hamlet !!  The turbines- each with a nominal power of 250KW , will have a life span of c twenty years.

You either love or hate wind turbines. They are renewable and sustainable. The feed in tarrifs make small scale renewable energy projects financially very attractive – and they should generally be encouraged, providing the impact  to the environment and local residents is minimised.

The full aplication can be found here : http://www.planning.bolton.gov.uk/DCOnlineV2/AcolNetCGI.dcgov?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=80301